New Coke 1985: The Most Unnecessary Own Goal in Marketing History

In April 1985, Coca-Cola voluntarily retired the best-selling soft drink in America. The research was solid. The sample size was enormous. The decision was catastrophic. This episode traces all four beats: what the team expected and why, what signals were already visible in the research files, where the exec call diverged from the available evidence, and which lessons from those 79 days became foundational in product strategy.

New Coke 1985: The Most Unnecessary Own Goal in Marketing History
0:0011:54
In April 1985, Coca-Cola voluntarily retired the best-selling soft drink in America and replaced it with a sweeter formula — backed by 200,000 taste tests and the full conviction of the executive team. Within 79 days, they reversed course. This episode walks through what actually happened: what the team thought the data was telling them, what signals were sitting right there in the research files that got discounted, where the decision-making process broke from the evidence, and which lessons from that debacle actually made it into mainstream product strategy.
The New Coke story is less about arrogance and more about a subtler trap — one that product and strategy teams still fall into regularly. When you frame a problem a certain way, the data you collect can be completely accurate and still lead you somewhere wrong. Coke's research wasn't bad. Their sample was enormous, their methodology was clean, and the results were consistent. What went wrong was the question they chose to ask — and the question they forgot to ask.

このコンテンツについて、さらに観点や背景を補足しましょう。

  • ログインするとコメントできます。